skip navigation
Little Women

Little Women(1994)

TCM Messageboards
Post your comments here
ADD YOUR COMMENT>

share:
Remind Me

TCMDb Archive MaterialsView all archives (0)

DVDs from TCM Shop

Little Women With their father away at war,... MORE > $10.95 Regularly $14.99 Buy Now blu-ray

USER REVIEWS

user reviews

See Detailed Ratings
    Acting of Lead Performers
    Acting of Supporting Cast
    Director
    Music Score
    Title Sequence
  • No Ratings Available Add Yours Now
    Screenplay
    Cinematography
    Historical Importance
    Would You Recommend?
  • 0 Member Ratings

Add your ratings! Each of the detailed ratings you select will result in a cumulative score for this film.

You can also write a review by clicking here. Your review will then be posted for everyone to read.

Thank You!

We have received your ratings and calculated them into the overall user ratings for this title.

You can also write a review by clicking here. Your review will then be posted for everyone to read.

    Rate the acting of the Lead Performers
    Rate the acting of the Supporting Cast
    Rate the Director
    Rating of the Music Score
    Rating of the Title Sequence
    Screenplay
    Creatively uses the camera to tell the story
    Importance in Cinema history
    Would you recommend for fans of this genre
Submit Ratings Cancel Write a Review Read Reviews

*By submitting your contribution, you agree to TCM's Terms of Use. TCM will use your personal information consistent with our Privacy Policy

NO REVIEWS AVAILABLE

The title has not been reviewed. Be the first to write a review by clicking here to start.

  • little women 1994

    • kevin sellers
    • 12/26/18

    The best of the three Hollywood whacks at Louisa M. Alcott's classic 'cause it's the least sentimental, although emphatically not the least teary. I defy even the biggest film cynic not to be somewhere in the neighborhood of weepy during Beth's death scene, which is easily the best cinematic rendition of that particular bit of lugubriousness. Helping to give this film a sharper edge than its two predecessors is director Gillian Armstrong and screenwriter Robin Swicord's ability to bring the March family out of its Disneyish, Christmas cocoon (most annoyingly evident in the 1949 incarnation) and into the emerging feminism and Civil War angst of Concord Mass. in the 1860s. As for the acting, it runs the gamut from good (Winona Ryder/Christian Bale) to ok (Trini Alvarado) to miscast (Gabriel Byrne) to well nigh perfect (Claire Danes). So, even though it's irksomely shot in Canada, with 1860s New York looking like a Gilmore Girls set, this is a wonderful work that Greta Gerwig will have a hard time topping. Give it an A minus. P.S. Lovely "American Experience" music by Thomas Newman, especially the title theme.

  • Compared to the '33 & '49 versions...

    • Jarrod McDonald
    • 6/17/10

    Some things work, other things don't. I think Sarandon brings something unique to the role of Marmee; she's not as glamorous as Mary Astor, and her earthiness actually serves the part well. Wynona is good, very good in fact, and physically she resembles Kay Francis who plays Jo in Little Men. Most of the other actors seem miscast. They are Hollywood youth known for their wildness (and Wynona even has a criminal record), so it's hard to buy most of them playing wholesome characters. Gabriel Byrne does fine, but he's Irish, not German (Brazzi in the 49 version was Italian). What I like least about this one is that I think director Gillian Armstrong is trying to make the visuals perfect (and they are), but the film lacks heart and deeply resonant emotion when it gets too aesthetic. One major difference in this one compared to the earlier films is the extensive use of outdoor locations for filming, which serves the wedding scene very well and Jo and Bhaer's reunion at the end. Another plus is the inclusion of Mary Wickes in a final screen role. She's wonderful as Aunt March. But she and Sarandon can't make up for the miscasting of some of the younger actors which gives the story an anachronistic feel.

  • Little Women (1994)

    • Jay
    • 7/2/09

    The is the best filmed version of the classic story. The cast is perfect. Winona Ryder makes an outstanding Jo. The art direction and costumes are outstanding, the supporting cast is wonderful. Fine cinematography and truer to the book than any other version. Superb period detail.

  • Cool

    • Josephine
    • 10/13/08

    This is a good movie, but not as absolutly fantastic as the 1933 version. I suggest that you see that one before you see this one. It is so much better. Probably because I am in love with Katharine Hepburn.

  • Your Name
  • Your Email (optional)
  • Your Location (optional)
      Rate the acting of the Lead Performers
      Rate the acting of the Supporting Cast
      Rate the Director
      Rating of the Music Score
      Rating of the Title Sequence
      Screenplay
      Creatively uses the camera to tell the story
      Importance in Cinema history
      Would you recommend for fans of this genre

  • Title of your Review
  • Your Review

    Character Limit! You have reached the 2,000 word character limit for this review.

  • Preview & Submit Cancel Submit Review Go Back
Thank You!

We have received your ratings and calculated them into the overall user ratings for this title.

Click the button below to read reviews and see your posting:

Close Detailed Ratings (optional)

*We protect your personal infortmation and will not provide it to anyone without your consent. For a complete explanation, please refer to TCM's Privacy Policy. By submitting your contribution, you agree to TCM's Terms of Use.